FRFT Responds to Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Decision: The Fourteenth Amendment Was Written for Freedmen First
- Freedmen Nation
- 2 hours ago
- 6 min read
Today, the Supreme Court rejected President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order in Trump v. Barbara. The Court held that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.
Read the Supreme Court decision PDF here:
FRFT acknowledges the ruling.
But FRFT does not celebrate this decision.
Our position is clear: birthright citizenship was mainly created as a Reconstruction correction for formerly enslaved people and their Successors — the Descendants of American Slaves — after the Civil War.
The Fourteenth Amendment was not written in a vacuum. It was written after slavery. It was written after Dred Scott. It was written after the United States had denied citizenship to people whose families, labor, communities, and legal claims were already rooted in this land.
That history matters.
FRFT does not agree with framing this decision as a simple victory for “birthright citizenship” without centering the people whose exclusion created the need for the Citizenship Clause in the first place.
The Reconstruction Amendments were not created for foreign citizens unlawfully present in the United States to establish citizenship for their children by childbirth. They were created to correct the legal denial of citizenship to formerly enslaved people, Freedmen, and their Successors after centuries of forced labor, exclusion, family separation, property denial, and legal nonrecognition.
That is why FRFT cannot treat this ruling as a full victory.
The Court protected a broad constitutional rule, but it did not protect Verified Freedmen status. It did not recognize the Descendants of American Slaves as the specific domestic status community whose citizenship history gave rise to the Fourteenth Amendment. It did not create reparative eligibility. It did not stop public institutions from burying Freedmen inside broad racial, minority, diversity, immigrant-centered, or generalized citizenship categories.
That is the problem.
The country continues to use the history of Freedmen to expand broad legal protections for others while still refusing to specifically recognize Freedmen status, Freedmen records, Freedmen claims, and Freedmen institutional authority.
Justice Clarence Thomas Confirmed the Freedmen-Centered History
Even though FRFT does not agree with the final outcome of the Court’s decision, Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent is important because it confirms the history FRFT has been warning about.
Justice Thomas wrote that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment “constitutionalized the Civil Rights Act’s citizenship provision,” and that the “main object” of the Clause was to settle “the citizenship of freed [slaves].” He also stated that the Citizenship Clause “forever closed the door on Dred Scott” by constitutionalizing the Civil Rights Act of 1866. (Supreme Court)
That matters.
FRFT’s position is not new. It is rooted in the same Reconstruction history Justice Thomas identified. Birthright citizenship was mainly created to correct the denial of citizenship to formerly enslaved people and their Successors after the Civil War.
Justice Thomas went even further in his dissent. He wrote that the Citizenship Clause was enacted for people who were born in this country and called it home. He specifically connected that purpose to “freed slaves such as Dred Scott” and to Frederick Douglass’s demand for citizenship “not as aliens nor as exiles,” but as Americans. He also pointed to Reconstruction-era statements that temporary residents were not the original target of the Clause. (Supreme Court)
FRFT sees that as a critical admission inside the decision.
The majority used the Fourteenth Amendment to protect broad birthright citizenship. But Justice Thomas’s dissent confirms the historical foundation: the Citizenship Clause was centered on Freedmen, Reconstruction, and the correction of Dred Scott. That is why FRFT says the Fourteenth Amendment was written for Freedmen first.
This is also why Status Verification is now even more important.
If the government and courts continue applying Freedmen history broadly while refusing to specifically recognize Verified Freedmen status, then Freedmen must document ourselves, verify our status, and protect our records before others use our history while excluding us from direct recognition and repair.
Getting Status Verified Is Even More Important Now
This decision makes getting Status Verified even more important.
When the government, courts, universities, corporations, and public agencies discuss citizenship, equity, civil rights, reparations, or public benefits, Freedmen are often pushed into broad categories that do not identify who we are. Without Status Verification, our people can be counted, spoken for, used symbolically, and then excluded when real recognition, funding, repair, or eligibility is being decided.
Status Verification creates a documented record.
It separates Verified Freedmen from broad racial labels, immigrant-centered classifications, and general citizenship categories. It confirms that our claim is not simply based on being born in the United States. Our claim is connected to slavery, emancipation, Reconstruction, Freedmen records, family continuity, and the unfinished obligations owed to the Descendants of American Slaves.
That distinction matters now more than ever.
A person may be a citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment and still not be a Verified Freedman. A person may be born in America and still not carry the specific status history of the Freedmen community. A person may benefit from birthright citizenship and still have no reparative claim connected to American slavery.
That is why Freedmen must not wait for the government to define us.
We must document ourselves.
We must verify our status.
We must preserve our records.
We must build our own institutional recognition before outside agencies, vendors, nonprofits, political groups, or government offices attempt to control who qualifies as Freedmen.
FRFT’s position is clear: Status Verification is protection.
It protects our history.
It protects our records.
It protects our eligibility.
It protects our institutional standing.
It protects our Successors from being erased inside broad categories that were never designed to repair Freedmen specifically.
FRFT stands on this distinction:
General citizenship and Verified Freedmen status are not the same thing.
A person may be born in the United States and be a citizen under the Court’s ruling, but that does not make that person a Verified Freedman. A person may benefit from the broad language of the Fourteenth Amendment, but that does not give that person the historical status, reparative claim, or community standing of the Descendants of American Slaves.
FRFT’s concern is not only about immigration. It is about historical displacement.
When the Fourteenth Amendment is discussed only as a general birthright citizenship provision, Freedmen are erased from the very constitutional history that was written because of our ancestors’ exclusion. When the Citizenship Clause is applied broadly without specific Freedmen recognition, the country once again takes a legal correction created through Freedmen suffering and turns it into a general benefit while leaving Freedmen without direct repair.
That is unacceptable.
The decision also contains a serious warning. Justice Kavanaugh agreed that the executive order could not stand under current federal statute, but he stated that Congress could amend 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a) or pass new legislation creating exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. He further stated that such a statute would, in his view, pass constitutional muster.
FRFT sees that language as important.
Even inside a ruling that rejected the executive order, the door was left open for Congress to revisit the issue. That confirms that the fight over citizenship, status, classification, and recognition is not over.
FRFT’s position remains firm:
Birthright citizenship belongs first to the Reconstruction history of Freedmen.
It was created because people descended from American slavery were denied citizenship in their own country. It was created because Freedmen had no foreign homeland, owed no allegiance to a foreign power, and were part of the domestic body politic that this country had abused, exploited, and excluded.
The government should not continue using Freedmen history to justify broad protections for others while refusing to specifically recognize Verified Freedmen as a distinct status-based people.
FRFT is not against constitutional protection.
FRFT is against Freedmen erasure.
FRFT is against immigrant-centered narratives replacing Reconstruction truth.
FRFT is against public institutions using the Fourteenth Amendment while ignoring the people whose history forced the nation to write it.
This ruling may protect broad birthright citizenship, but it does not complete the work of Reconstruction. It does not repair Freedmen. It does not secure land, records, inheritance, historical recognition, or institutional standing for the Descendants of American Slaves.
That is why FRFT will continue building status-based verification, historical preservation, public notices, institutional declarations, and community protection for Verified Freedmen.
Our position is simple:
The Fourteenth Amendment was written for Freedmen first.
Birthright citizenship must not be separated from Freedmen history.
Verified Freedmen status must not be erased inside broad citizenship categories.
The Descendants of American Slaves must be recognized as the specific domestic status community at the center of the Reconstruction promise.
Getting Status Verified is no longer optional for those who want their Freedmen status documented, protected, and recognized.
FRFT acknowledges the Supreme Court’s ruling.
But FRFT does not celebrate a decision that uses Freedmen history to expand broad citizenship while still leaving Freedmen without specific recognition, repair, and protection.
The work continues.
Read the Supreme Court decision PDF here:
Support the work: Donate or Sponsor!
JUNETEENTH Captures the Soul of our Liberty As Emancipated Birthright American Citizens and Patriots who served protecting the creation and foundation for our America. June/July MONTHS of Salubrious Ancestral Freedmen Celebration From Slave State Galveston, TX into 10 others. Our Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness and Self Determination rolls into our Joy and Independence of Inheritance: Soul Food, Soul Music, Soul Train, and Soul Power!!! HAPPY 4th of July Freedmen American Patriots, 50M Strong. 158 year ago we were 12M during the 1870 Census Count From Slave State Enslaved Schedules Now counted as Birthright American Citizens As of 1868 14th Amendment State's Mandated Constitutional Archives. Celebrate as the Oldest and Longest Class of Constitutional American Patriots This Reunion Weekend...COOKOUT