A Formal Submission to the United Nations: Correcting the Classification of Reparations

The Freedmen Reparations Fund Trust (FRFT) has taken a decisive step onto the international stage.

On March 30, 2026, FRFT formally submitted an institutional memorandum to the United Nations calling for a correction in how reparations related to the Transatlantic Slave Trade are classified, defined, and addressed.

This was not a public statement.

This was not a symbolic gesture.

This was a formal submission designed to enter the international record.

Click here to read the Formal Submission for Correcting the Classification of Reparations to the United Nations.

---

Why This Submission Matters

For decades, discussions surrounding reparations have been broadly framed under global or diaspora-based narratives. While these conversations carry weight, they often fail to distinguish between fundamentally different categories of harm.

FRFT’s submission makes one point clear:

Justice requires precision.

The harms experienced by Freedmen — including those recognized as Descendants of American Chattel Slavery — arose from a specific system:

• Chattel slavery implemented within the United States

• Followed by Reconstruction failures

• Jim Crow laws

• Redlining

• Discriminatory federal programs

These are not generalized global harms.

They are jurisdiction-specific injuries tied directly to U.S. governmental action.

---

The Core Issue: Misclassification

At the center of this submission is a critical concern:

Reparations are being discussed without properly identifying who the claimants are.

When classifications are too broad:

• Claims become diluted

• Accountability becomes unclear

• Policy outcomes become ineffective

FRFT’s memorandum addresses this directly by asserting that Freedmen represent a distinct, status-based claimant class whose claims must be recognized independently within any reparative framework.

---

What Was Submitted

The memorandum includes:

• A formal institutional position on reparations classification

• A structured legal and historical argument

• A clear distinction between U.S.-based harms and global or colonial claims

• Proposed amendment language for the United Nations to adopt

This amendment language is designed to ensure that:

• Freedmen are properly identified in international discourse

• Claims are not misrepresented by external parties

• Reparative frameworks remain accurate and enforceable

---

A Necessary Clarification

FRFT’s position is not one of opposition to global discussions on reparations.

It is a call for clarity and proper classification.

Claims arising from:

• Colonialism

• International exploitation

• Global systems of harm

must be analyzed separately from:

• The specific, documented harms inflicted upon Freedmen within the United States

Blending these categories does not strengthen the movement for justice —

it weakens it.

---

Institutional Action, Not Symbolism

This submission represents a shift in approach.

Rather than engaging solely in public discourse, FRFT is:

• Entering formal international channels

• Establishing recorded positions

• Providing structured amendment language

• Positioning itself as an institutional authority on classification and claimant standing

This is how long-term change is built — not through slogans, but through documented, enforceable frameworks.

---

What Comes Next

With the memorandum now executed and submitted:

• It will be reviewed by relevant United Nations bodies

• It becomes part of the international record

• It establishes a formal position that can be referenced in future discussions, policy considerations, and institutional engagements

FRFT remains open to dialogue.

But that dialogue must be grounded in accuracy.

---

Final Word

The question is no longer whether reparations should be discussed.

The question is:

Will they be discussed correctly?

FRFT has made its position clear:

Freedmen — including those recognized as Descendants of American Chattel Slavery — must be accurately identified, properly classified, and directly represented in any framework addressing reparative justice connected to the Transatlantic Slave Trade.

Anything less is a misrepresentation of history.

And a barrier to justice.

---

Clarification of Terminology

For broader public understanding and alignment across discussions, Freedmen may also be referenced in public discourse as Descendants of American Slaves; however, FRFT maintains a status-based classification framework grounded in the specific historical system of American chattel slavery and its documented aftermath.