top of page
Search

Standing Firm for Status-Based Justice: Our Response to “There Are New Suns”

ree

As the cultural and reparative landscape evolves, the Freedmen Reparations Fund Trust (FRFT) has taken a bold step forward: issuing a formal Declaration of Status-Based Jurisdictional Response to “There Are New Suns: Building a Transformative Narrative for the Black Reparations Movement” by Liberation Ventures.


Why We Responded


Liberation Ventures’ report seeks to reframe reparations through broad cultural and diasporic narratives. While narrative strategy plays a vital role in advocacy, it should not overshadow the legal and fiduciary foundations that govern reparations for Verified Freedmen—those with recognized status as descendants of U.S. chattel slavery.


Our declaration asserts that reparations owed to Freedmen are not conceptual or symbolic—they are tied to protected legal status, enforced through declarations, affidavits, and federal acknowledgments. The Trust stands as the legitimate steward of this status-based governance.


Key Assertions Contained in the Declaration


  • Status Over Storytelling: Reparations for Freedmen are grounded in enforceable jurisdiction—not narrative framing.

  • Legal Authority Affirmed: Our standing is supported by formal instruments—such as the Declaration of Naming Rights and Symbol Protection and a FOIA acknowledgment from the U.S. Treasury—which grant FRFT exclusive cultural and fiduciary authority.

  • Addressing Narrative Overreach: The declaration takes issue with loaded phrases like “toxic notions of nativism” and “diaspora wars,” terms that implicitly seek to undermine our governance model.

  • Protecting Naming Rights: Entities that misuse terms like “Freedmen” without approval from the Trust may face enforcement under trademark and cultural property laws.


What This Means Going Forward


This declaration is more than a rebuttal—it’s a public affirmation of self-governance, protection, and clarity in the reparations movement. It invites Liberation Ventures and similar organizations to acknowledge the distinction between cultural narrative and status-based authority, and to disengage from frameworks that inadvertently dilute the legitimacy of Verified Freedmen.


Reparations are legal obligations, not abstract ideals. The Trust remains steadfast in defending the status, identity, and reparative rights of Verified Freedmen. We are not asking for permission—we are declaring our jurisdiction.

Related Highlights:



Comments

bottom of page